Why subjective quantum mechanics allows objective science
Luboš Motl, November 05, 2012 Short answer: Because subjective knowledge (and ignorance) is and has always been compatible with objective science
Читать далееLuboš Motl, November 05, 2012 Short answer: Because subjective knowledge (and ignorance) is and has always been compatible with objective science
Читать далееLuboš Motl, july 05, 2014 The subjective character of certain processes doesn’t mean that there aren’t other subjects Stubborn warriors
Читать далееLuboš Motl, July 14, 2014 RAF has told us about a new quant-ph preprint The quantum pigeonhole principle and the
Читать далееLuboš Motl, March 11, 2016 Here’s a way to see in what way quantum mechanics generalizes classical physics – and
Читать далееLuboš Motl, March 22, 2016 Steven Weinberg has published a new paper about the foundations of quantum mechanics (QM) in PRA:
Читать далееLuboš Motl, January 27, 2016 Sabine Hossenfelder tries to promote some bizarre would-be research of her pseudoscientific friends, in this case
Читать далееLuboš Motl, November 23, 2016 https://youtu.be/dzKWfw68M5U?si=ccQCMdAoyMhAx-KM Most of the sentences in the video are either downright wrong or at least
Читать далееLuboš Motl, august 29, 2016 In the discussion under his confused musings about the CHSH inequality, a volatile anti-quantum zealot
Читать далееLuboš Motl, september 15, 2016 I want to add a playful «research» twist to my explanations of the foundations of
Читать далееLuboš Motl, October 12, 2016 The delayed choice quantum eraser is a convoluted but straightforward experiment testing the quantum entanglement. This
Читать далее